Entries Tagged as 'vin scully'

Amazon.com Ban-nation, Vols/Bruins’ Thoughts, And Losing Jeff Kent is Addition by Subtraction?

Quick-hitters:

- Once again, I have allowed two rebates to go right up to the 30-day postmark deadline.

I guess this is a sign that I better start using MS Outlook or something :P.

- If I hear It’s Not My Time by 3 Doors Down one more time on Sirius Internet Radio, I might have to throw something through my computer screen.

Seriously…enough already!  I almost miss the days where Sirius was (seemingly) contractually obligated to play one Coldplay song on one of its stations at all times.

Contrary to what you might believe, this is not a rant against Coldplay or 3 Doors Down.  It is simply a rant against Sirius.

- So as many of you deal hunters probably know, Amazon has started swinging the ban stick at a number of individuals recently.  Everyone who got banned got this rather vague email:

Hello from Amazon.com.

A careful review of your account indicates you’ve experienced an extraordinary number of incidents with your orders and corresponding shipments.

In the normal course of business, the occasional problem is inevitable. The rate at which such problems have occurred on your account is extraordinary, however, and cannot continue. Effective immediately, your Amazon.com account is closed and you are no longer able to shop in our store.

Please know that any accounts related to yours have also been closed. If you were to open a new account, the same will result and it will also be closed. In the event that you attempt to do so, we will not accept the return of any additional orders, nor will we issue further refunds in connection with any future orders. We appreciate your cooperation in refraining from using our web site.

If you require additional assistance, or have any concerns, feel free to contact us directly at account-appeals@amazon.com.

Please do not contact regular Customer Service again, as they will no longer be able to assist you.

If you read through the thread, apparently Amazon.com CSRs can’t offer a thorough explanation of what “an extraordinary number of incidents” really means, though speculation is that this is referring to a large number of returns and/or price matches.

I understand that Amazon.com has a right to choose who they want to do business with, but they couldn’t offer a warning?  Also, reports are that not only are people unable to even log into their account to check their invoices, but individuals with outstanding gift certificate accounts may be SOL as well!  Furthermore, some individuals with both buyer and seller accounts are getting both locked because of the activity on their buyer account!

I was surprised that it took nearly a week for this story to hit The Consumerist, and I can’t say that I’m surprised by the reactions of the readers there, though I do not agree with what most of them are saying.  Yes, people that open multiple accounts to take advantage of the same promotion multiple times should be banned.  Yes, people that have a ridiculously high return rate—and the number of actual returns, not just the percentage, should also matter!—should be banned.  Nevertheless, shouldn’t these people be warned?  Is that too much to ask for?

For the record, my account has not been banned.  It would not surprise me in the least, though, if I find that email in my inbox in the coming days.

(The statement above is NOT an admission of guilt.)

- Quick thoughts on Monday’s Vols/Bruins’ game:  did somebody replace QB Kevin Craft with Peyton Manning in the second half?  How do you go from a guy throwing passes that a Pop Warner QB wouldn’t throw, to gunslinging passes into tight coverage to rally your team back from not one, but TWO second-half deficits?  How does a team lose both its starting QBs in the preseason, and then lose three senior starters during the game, and yet muster enough to hold off a ranked opponent?

And how must Tennessee be feeling, knowing that the game was lost on a missed chip-shot field goal in OT, minutes after their kicker bombed a 47-yard kick to tie the game in regulation?

Unfortunately for Bruins fans, this game did not end without some controversy (what else is new?).  Did Raymond Carter really get in on that 3-yard TD run?  Also, wasn’t the pass to Ryan Moya that set up the go-ahead touchdown in the fourth quarter an illegal forward pass?

Finally, who knew that the Bruins’ defense would be THIS good?  Sure, Tennessee is no USC or Florida, but the Vols’ offense looked really bad for three quarters against the blitzing Bruins’ D.


- I know we’re only talking about a four-game sample size.  I know two of the four games were played against a really young ( = bad) Padres team.  I know we ran into a pair of struggling aces (the D’Backs’ Webb and Haren).

However, do Dodger fans realize that the Boys in Blue are 4-0 since Jeff “Vin Scully talks too much” Kent went on the DL with a knee injury?

(Tangent:  Yes, Kent is an idiot for saying that Vin Scully talks too much, even if he thinks he’s right.  I realize that he might have been saying it in jest, but it still does not make it OK to slander “some guy” [his words, not mine] like Vinny.)

Sports enthusiasts always talk about chemistry and how important chemistry is to a championship.  The Giants won the Super Bowl last year because Tiki Barker and Jeremy Shockey weren’t around to ruin the team chemistry, people might say.

(I’d argue that the Giants’ D-Line mauled Tom Brady and the Pats’ O-Line).

Could it be said that the Dodgers might actually be better without Jeff Kent?  One would think not, seeing how well Kent has played since the Manny deal (despite what Kent might argue).  Secondly, Kent’s replacement—one Blake DeWitt—does not exactly strike fear into opposing pitchers the way Kent would.

I cannot, with a straight face, say that the Dodgers are definitely better without Kent.  However, if the Dodgers should string together a couple more victories—a 3-1 record to finish the homestand is not exactly a stretch!—I might have to entertain the thought.

And what happens when Kent returns?  What if the Dodgers start losing games again with him back?

Whatever happens, this will be a very intriguing rest of the season in the NL Minor League Division, aka the West.

Scully & Wooden For the Kids At the Nokia Theatre L.A. Live!

So as mentioned in my previous blog entry, I spent the night at the Nokia Theater L.A. Live with two sports icons (hell, world icons!): Vin Scully and “The Wizard of Westwood” John Wooden.

Random thoughts regarding the event:

1) John Wooden is 97 freaking years old, and sharper now than I am. I’d give anything to know as much as he has forgotten in his life.

Naturally, both he and Vin—Vin wheeled Wooden around in a wheelchair—got a huge standing ovation as the event started. Wooden was gracious enough to point to Scully, apparently trying to drum up an ovation for Vin as well. What a great sign of respect!

Did I mention that Wooden is 97?

2) Before the event started, I told my sister to watch for a “smattering” of boos directed towards the moderator of today’s event, Los Angeles Times’ writer T.J. Simers.

When he introduced himself, he got a HUGE chorus of boos. That was pretty damn funny! The P.R. director of the Nokia Theater L.A. Live saved his butt, though, explaining that it was pretty much Simers’ idea to arrange the talk. That drew a huge applause, though I sensed some people were giving him a “yeah, whatever” applause :P

Personally, I can’t stand T.J. Simers’ column. He comes off as very arrogant, brash, and an all-world jerk (at least Jim Rome conducts great interviews and is funny.) That being said, Simers did an excellent job as moderator, even though I felt that the mood of the room was a bit too light. I almost felt like I was watching a celebrity roast instead of an inspirational chat.

Too many jokes were thrown around, IMO, though the first one Simers cracked—something to the effect of “Let’s bring those two old men out, if they haven’t nodded off already”—was pretty damn funny. Simers picked on Wooden early and often, but the coach was game; he did an excellent job of trading blows with Simers.

Did I mention Wooden is 97?

Between jokes, Simers asked some excellent questions. He asked Scully about Eric Gagne and PEDs—(paraphrasing) “I remember only what I saw on the field”—and he allowed Vin to tell a great story about how he and Jackie Robinson once competed in an ice-skating race. He asked Wooden about Kareem Abdul-Jabbar once declaring Wooden’s famous “Pyramid of Success” as “corny,” and asked about Wooden’s secret to long life.

3) Listening to Vin Scully live was just so much more awesome than listening to him on TV or the radio. When Simers asked Scully his first question (I don’t remember it at the moment), Scully immediately gave a typical Scully answer. Rather than a short, simple response, Scully answered the question using the same elegance and prose he has for over 50 years.

Vin Scully is only 80, by the way.

4) There are two moments that stand out from tonight’s show. Wooden’s recount of how he met Nellie (his now deceased wife), how he writes a letter to her on the 21st of every month, and how he still “talks” to her everyday was very touching; my sister remarked that she almost shed a tear. I can’t say that I didn’t either.

(Nell Wooden died in 1985, for the record, and still he’ll write a letter to her every 21st day of each month.)

The other unforgettable moment was not nearly as emotional. When Simers asked Vin if he was going to retire or announce games “until the very end,” most of the crowd screamed “NOOOOOOOOOOO!!!” Scully gave the perfect non-committal response, saying that he would take things day-to-day. That got a roaring applause.

5) I’m not sure if this made it on the live broadcast—Fox Sports Net Prime Ticket aired the show live—but Bill Walton’s little montage about Wooden teaching him and some other freshmen how to put on their shoes and socks was classic. Minutes later, a kid that survived cancer came out to a huge ovation, and Wooden demonstrated that shoes and socks lecture on him. That must have been a thrill of a lifetime for the kid.

Though I will never forget the hour and a half I spent listening to these two life legends speak, I will also not forget the real reason why this talk was set up in the first place: to raise funds and awareness for those afflicted with cancer. My only regret of the night: I wish I had better seats.

If these two legends ever decide to do another talk, I’m there.

Until next time!

Bill Simmons’ Running Diary of Game Four, And Other NBA Finals’ Thoughts

No quick-hitters, but one quick aside:  tonight at the Nokia Theater LA Live, Vin Scully & John Wooden will be on-stage together, and yours truly has tickets to the affair.  Two legends of their respective sports—and arguably life itself—and the proceeds go to cancer research?  Awesome.

I can’t wait!

- So after having a night to sleep on the disaster that was Game Four, I woke up, dropped by ESPN.com, and happened to notice that Bill Simmons posted a running diary of the game.

(Yeah, it just so happened that he was keeping a running diary of arguably the greatest combination comeback/gag job in NBA Finals history.  Uh-huh.)

Let the hysteria/myopia begin:

1) “Special thanks to Gasol for not helping in time — I’m starting to think Kwame Brown, Javaris Crittenton and two draft picks was a fair trade.”  By this logic, the Randy Moss trade was an awful one for the Pats.

Does anyone think the Lakers would be anywhere close to where they are without Gasol?  And would be singing a different tune if Bynum were healthy?

2) “Just when I thought this couldn’t get any better, they just cut to a replay of Vujacic punching a chair and fighting back tears on the bench. That wasn’t just the best moment of the Celtics season, I think it was the best moment of my life.”  Talk about kicking a guy (and all of Los Angeles, for that matter) while he’s down.  Seriously?  The best moment of your life?

3) “RAY ALLEN!

RAY ALLEN!

RAY ALLEN!”

As great as Allen has played in this series, the MVP has to go to Pierce (his Game One “theatrics” aside), right?  The Celts’ comeback only got rolling when Pierce finally realized that the likes of Vlad, Walton, Ariza, and even Kobe couldn’t guard him.  In addition, Pierce had as much to do with Kobe’s lackluster game than Kobe himself.

4) “The Kobe-MJ thing … done. Over. Jordan never would have let that happen in the Finals. Ever. Under any circumstances. Nobody is ever allowed to bring this up again.”

Done and done.  Kobe could win the next four rings by himself, and I wouldn’t rank him up there with MJ.  Simmons couldn’t be more right on.

5) “For all my bitching about Doc Rivers over the years, I have to hand it to him — he played the right guys at the right time and helped facilitate one of the great moments in Boston Celtics history. The man deserves all the credit in the world. He outcoached the Zen Master. It happened. His focus was on winning, and they won.”

See #4.  Rivers could easily have over-coached, but he didn’t.  He was as integral to the Celtics’ winning, I’d argue, as the Big Three.

When Simmons was expressing his lust for the Patriots during the last NFL season, his articles were completely unreadable to me.  I really couldn’t stand them.  For some reason though, his love-fest for both the Red Sox and the Celtics don’t annoy me nearly as much.  I guess it might have something to do with my added hatred for Beli-cheat, Brady, et al.

- Some more NBA Finals parting thoughts:

1) Tell me John Hollinger did not just rate Dwyane Wade’s 2006 FT-shooting contest performance as the greatest Finals performance of all time.

(If you want to award Wade an Oscar after the fact for his performance, on the other hand, I’m fine with that.)

Wade’s performance was better than any of MJ’s six Finals’ performances?  Really?  You can say that with a straight face?

2) Every LA fan has to wonder how much different our interior defense would be with a healthy Bynum out there.

By “different,” of course I mean “better.”

I’ll think about it…for another week or so.

3) Does this game do more to Kobe’s legacy than the three rings he won with Shaq?

I’m inclined to say “absolutely.”

I guess I can now return my Sceptre LCD TV I bought from Costco early last year :P.  Do you blame me?  I’ve got a summer to look forward to of watching the Dodgers stink (in HD, at least!), Boston Celtics’ championship DVDs (”Witness the greatest comeback in NBA Finals History!  AHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!”), and decent summer shows—My Boys, Burn Notice, to name a couple—that aren’t in HD because Time Warner hasn’t yet offered USA in HD yet.

(That was supposed to be a Bostonian “AHHHHHHHHH!” like in Good Will Hunting, and not a scream.  I’m terrible at phonetically spelling stuff :P)

Later.